Article: Motov S et al. Comparison of intravenous ketorolac at three single-dose regimens for treating acute pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2016. PMID: 27993418
Clinical question: Do higher doses of IV ketorolac provide improved analgesia in the ED?
Population: Patients 18 – 65 years of age presenting to the ED with acute flank, abdominal, musculoskeletal or headache pain that was >/= 5 on a standard 10 point pain scale in whom the attending physician though ketorolac would be an appropriate medication choice.
Intervention: 10-, 15- or 30- mg doses of ketorolac prepared in identical syringes
Control: No Control Group
Outcome (Primary): Pain reduction at 30 minutes
Outcomes (Secondary): Rates and percentages of subjects experiencing adverse effects and requiring rescue analgesia
Design: Single-center, randomized, double-blind trial performed at a large urban ED.
Excluded:
- Age > 65
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Active peptic ulcer disease
- Acute GI hemorrhage
- Known renal or hepatic insufficiency
- Allergy to NSAIDs
- Unstable vital signs
- Patients that had already received an analgesic
Primary Results:
- Enrollment: 24o patients (80 in each group)
- 312 patients approached, 72 refused to participate
- All 240 patients included in analysis
Pain Reduction at 30 Minutes (Primary Outcome):
- 80% power to detect a 1.3 point difference in pain score at 30 minutes
- 10mg Group: Pain score 7.7 —> 5.2 (diff 2.5)
- 15 mg Group: Pain score 7.5 —> 5.1 (diff 2.4)
- 30 mg Group: Pain score 7.8 —> 4.8 (diff 3.0)
- No statistically or clinically significant difference between doses
Secondary Outcomes:
- Adverse Events
- No significant events in any group
- Common events were dizziness and nausea which were equal across groups
- Need for rescue analgesia was not different across groups
Strengths:
- Study asks a clinically important question with a patient centered outcome
- Randomization conducted by computer generation and blinding was appropriate
- Clinically relevant adverse events were tracked
- For the primary endpoint, only 2 data points were missing out of 240 patients
Limitations:
- Single center study decreasing external application of results
- Convenience sampling used introducing selection bias
- Study is too small to comment on rare or uncommon adverse events
- The study investigates the analgesic ceiling effect but does not provide information regarding the anti-inflammatory ceiling.
Author’s Conclusions:
“Ketorolac has similar analgesic efficacy at intravenous doses of 10, 15, and 30 mg, showing that intravenous ketorolac administered at the analgesic ceiling dose (10 mg) provided effective pain relief to ED patients with moderate to severe pain without increased adverse effects.”
Our Conclusions:
This high-quality RDCT demonstrates that the analgesic ceiling for ketorolac appears to be 10 mg if given intravenously. Administration of higher doses is unlikely to improve analgesic results.
Potential Impact to Current Practice:
The results and conclusions of this study implore providers to embrace lower dosing of ketorolac than what is standardly employed (i.e. 30 mg IV). This study did not find an increase in adverse events with the higher dosing of ketorolac but, the study was too small to establish safety. Additionally, if there is no added benefit to analgesia of higher doses, higher doses only hold potential for harm.
Clinical Bottom Line:
Based on the best available literature at this time, providers should switch to giving 10 mg of ketorolac IV for acute pain in the ED.
Checkout More At:
- PharmERToxGuy: The Ceiling Effect of IV Ketorolac
- SOCMOB Blog: NSAID Part 2: The Ceiling Effect
- The SGEM: SGEM #175 – Dancing on the Ceiling with Ketorolac for Pain
Post Peer Reviewed By: Salim Rezaie (Twitter: @srrezaie)
This post is cross-posted over at Core EM.
